R Michael Pyle wrote:Oops...

I doubt I would have paid that much for it anyway! I'm fascinated with the whole idea of "wikipedia" histories. You can publish a book on (insert subject matter here) derived totally from wikipedia articles...and then wikipedia will accept your book as a reliable source for their online articles! It's too perfect.
I've checked Worldcat (there's a water resources scientist named Harold Lockwood, so I got a
lot of rather surprising hits), but didn't see anything. I don't know if there's been anything been published on Lockwood in Classic Images or any of the more scholarly publications. I should probably check JSTOR.