First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

Open, general discussion of silent films, personalities and history.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

daveh

  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:02 pm

First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostThu Jul 12, 2012 7:37 am

On July 12, 1912, "Queen Elizabeth" became the first feature-length film to be shown in the US. Famous Players purchased the distribution rights to the film from French-German company Eclipse. The film starred Sandra Bernhardt and made its premiere at the Lyceum Theater in New York City. At 44 minutes, it was the longest film shown in the US to date, and was the first film to be seriously reviewed in major newspapers.

More info:

http://www.pictureshowman.com/timeline_1910_1919.cfm
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0002020/releaseinfo

Does anyone know if the film still exists?

Thanks,
David Hawksworth
Offline
User avatar

Mike Gebert

Site Admin

  • Posts: 3416
  • Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:23 pm
  • Location: Chicago

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostThu Jul 12, 2012 8:31 am



No idea how close the existing version is to what was released then. But thanks for noting the occasion!
We should respect the other fellow's religion, but only to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is attractive and his children intelligent. —H.L. Mencken
Offline

Richard P. May

  • Posts: 381
  • Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:12 am
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostThu Jul 12, 2012 8:34 am

It was Sarah Bernhardt.
Dick May
Offline
User avatar

silentfilm

Moderator

  • Posts: 6795
  • Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:31 pm
  • Location: Dallas, TX USA

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostThu Jul 12, 2012 11:21 am

It was copyrighted in 1912 in the "Paper Print" program, and the paper print survived. It has been available on film prints since the 1960s. It is very much a filmed version of the stage play, but it is certainly an important part of film history. It is available from several home-made DVD sellers.
Offline
User avatar

Salty Dog

  • Posts: 179
  • Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:43 pm

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostThu Jul 12, 2012 1:26 pm

I don't think it's actually the first feature film. I know the Richard the III feature predates it, and there are probably others.
Bill Coleman
Offline

romecapitol

  • Posts: 81
  • Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostThu Jul 12, 2012 3:04 pm

Seems like there were some longish versions of "The Passion Play" earlier in the century?
--Art Pierce
Offline
User avatar

Bruce Long

  • Posts: 122
  • Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 6:55 am

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostThu Jul 12, 2012 4:07 pm

I have a Guiness' book from 1980, which says that the first feature film released in its entirety (not broken into parts) in the USA was Dante's Inferno (Italy, 1911), then Oliver Twist (USA, 1911), then Queen Elizabeth (France, 1912).
Offline
User avatar

Mike Gebert

Site Admin

  • Posts: 3416
  • Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:23 pm
  • Location: Chicago

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostThu Jul 12, 2012 4:38 pm

All firsts are not really firsts, everyone knows that.

What's that feature-length story that was told via glass slides and a narrator? It was like a staged fotonovela. It's before any film.
We should respect the other fellow's religion, but only to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is attractive and his children intelligent. —H.L. Mencken
Offline
User avatar

Frederica

  • Posts: 3239
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
  • Location: Kowea Town, Los Angeles

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostThu Jul 12, 2012 4:44 pm

Mike Gebert wrote:All firsts are not really firsts, everyone knows that.

What's that feature-length story that was told via glass slides and a narrator? It was like a staged fotonovela. It's before any film.


You're not the first person who's said that.
Fred
"You love your children. It's your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.”
― Game of Thrones
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"
Offline
User avatar

Rick Lanham

  • Posts: 535
  • Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:16 pm
  • Location: Gainesville, FL

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostThu Jul 12, 2012 9:25 pm

Frederica wrote:
Mike Gebert wrote:All firsts are not really firsts, everyone knows that.

What's that feature-length story that was told via glass slides and a narrator? It was like a staged fotonovela. It's before any film.


You're not the first person who's said that.


<chuckle>
Offline

moviepas

  • Posts: 775
  • Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:51 am

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostFri Jul 13, 2012 3:03 am

I don't think it's actually the first feature film. I know the Richard the III feature predates it, and there are probably others.

I might have been the Australian feature from 1900 called Soldiers of the Cross which also had a number of magic lantern slides in-between the moving footage. The film was made by the Salvation Army's then Limelight Productions H-Qeds in Melbourne's downtown and I think they had a sort of studio in nearby East Melb which would be waking distance from the HQ. The producer was one of the Booth family.

Only last night on talkback radio the two now in their 70s announcers mentioned it and the right title as above(unusual for one of them who always gets facts wrong on everything). The mention was because they were talking about Australia's biggest shopping center(Chadstone for Google Maps followers) and still expanding. They said the film had been made On the site. They may have been right. My slant on it was that the arena for the eating of the Christians was constructed at a Children's Home a little further up the same highway on a major corner where there was an ample tennis court that they used. (The original site of the center had been a Convert of the Good Shepherd and part of their land went to the center at the time. I think the center has all the land today & more.)

As far as I know the original slides exist either as slides or the original artwork that was photographed for the film. I understand the film went to America for distribution and that they hoped footage might be found there. Not sure any did.

However in the mid-20's they made a feature here of the Marcus Clarke novel, For the Term of His Natural Life and I understand footage from that one came back from USA. The film also had tinted scenes. I have seen a VHS but no DVD of this one. The film has a ship burning. It is understood that rare newsreels were used to create the explosive fire. If this is so, it shows the contempt the early filmmakers & others thought about saving actualities. Such stories are never happy ones to me.

There was another film released in 1906 called The Story of the Kelly Gang loosely based on fact about Australia's most notorious bushranger, Ned Kelly. Part exists only and a few more feet turned up in recent times. A documentary incorporating the existing footage and a book has been issued on disc. It is said to be the world's first narrative feature film. It might have run 60mins or so and was also made in my city. Kelly was hung in a former famous Melbourne jail and his remains have been identified and are to go to the surviving family for a proper burial. The grave was a prison grave at Coburg, a Melbourne suburb and the former prison was called Pentridge, the earliest name of Coburg. Now being developed as a housing estate(I visited this site earlier this year on the way to a funeral on that side of the city), the developer believes he owns the relics and wanted to do his own memorial. Mick Jagger played the Irish Kelly in a c1970 film and the Hartney Arthur, of the former Milestone 8mm business, was involved in late 40s attempts to tell the story of Kelly's career(?). As a sideline, Kelly cussed out the Judge, Sir Redmond Barry, who died suddenly a few days after pronouncing the death sentence on Kelly.
Offline
User avatar

silentfilm

Moderator

  • Posts: 6795
  • Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:31 pm
  • Location: Dallas, TX USA

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostFri Jul 13, 2012 11:07 am

There were also some filmed boxing matches from the early 1900s that were feature length. These would be considered newsreels, unless they were the Lubin recreations, which would be semi-fictional.
Offline

WaverBoy

  • Posts: 1141
  • Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:50 am

Re: First Feature Film Shown in US 100 Years Ago

PostFri Jul 13, 2012 11:31 am

moviepas wrote:I don't think it's actually the first feature film. I know the Richard the III feature predates it, and there are probably others.

I might have been the Australian feature from 1900 called Soldiers of the Cross which also had a number of magic lantern slides in-between the moving footage. The film was made by the Salvation Army's then Limelight Productions H-Qeds in Melbourne's downtown and I think they had a sort of studio in nearby East Melb which would be waking distance from the HQ. The producer was one of the Booth family.

Only last night on talkback radio the two now in their 70s announcers mentioned it and the right title as above(unusual for one of them who always gets facts wrong on everything). The mention was because they were talking about Australia's biggest shopping center(Chadstone for Google Maps followers) and still expanding. They said the film had been made On the site. They may have been right. My slant on it was that the arena for the eating of the Christians was constructed at a Children's Home a little further up the same highway on a major corner where there was an ample tennis court that they used. (The original site of the center had been a Convert of the Good Shepherd and part of their land went to the center at the time. I think the center has all the land today & more.)

As far as I know the original slides exist either as slides or the original artwork that was photographed for the film. I understand the film went to America for distribution and that they hoped footage might be found there. Not sure any did.

However in the mid-20's they made a feature here of the Marcus Clarke novel, For the Term of His Natural Life and I understand footage from that one came back from USA. The film also had tinted scenes. I have seen a VHS but no DVD of this one. The film has a ship burning. It is understood that rare newsreels were used to create the explosive fire. If this is so, it shows the contempt the early filmmakers & others thought about saving actualities. Such stories are never happy ones to me.

There was another film released in 1906 called The Story of the Kelly Gang loosely based on fact about Australia's most notorious bushranger, Ned Kelly. Part exists only and a few more feet turned up in recent times. A documentary incorporating the existing footage and a book has been issued on disc. It is said to be the world's first narrative feature film. It might have run 60mins or so and was also made in my city. Kelly was hung in a former famous Melbourne jail and his remains have been identified and are to go to the surviving family for a proper burial. The grave was a prison grave at Coburg, a Melbourne suburb and the former prison was called Pentridge, the earliest name of Coburg. Now being developed as a housing estate(I visited this site earlier this year on the way to a funeral on that side of the city), the developer believes he owns the relics and wanted to do his own memorial. Mick Jagger played the Irish Kelly in a c1970 film and the Hartney Arthur, of the former Milestone 8mm business, was involved in late 40s attempts to tell the story of Kelly's career(?). As a sideline, Kelly cussed out the Judge, Sir Redmond Barry, who died suddenly a few days after pronouncing the death sentence on Kelly.


Yes, but the topic at hand isn't the first feature film produced, but the first feature film released in the U.S. And on that, the first would seem to be L'INFERNO; the only date I can find online for the U.S. release is July 1911, with no day specified.

Return to Talking About Silents

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Roseha and 2 guests