The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

Open, general discussion of classic sound-era films, personalities and history.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

Frederica

  • Posts: 3239
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
  • Location: Kowea Town, Los Angeles

The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostWed Aug 01, 2012 8:57 pm

Since we seem to be putting all our Britfilms in one Basket, I guess we might as well have more descriptive thread labeling. Through the kindness of friends (and Netflix) I’ve been feeding my burgeoning Britfilm addiction. Herewith is an updated report of some of the films I’ve seen over the past few months. You may talk amongst yourselves.

BLITHE SPIRIT, (1945), director David Lean, with Rex Harrison, Constance Cummings, Kay Hammond, and Margaret Rutherford. Hated the play, hated the movie. Awful people. You’re all on your own here.

DOCTOR IN THE HOUSE (1954), director Ralph Thomas, with Dirk Bogarde, Kenneth More, Donald Sinden, Muriel Pavlov, James Robertson Justice, Kay Kendall. In my quest to see more of Kendall’s short filmography, I streamed this from Netflix. I’m not sure how I missed this film for so long since the series is rather a classic, but there you go. It’s an enjoyable comedy, anchored by Dirk Bogarde’s straight man performance (no pun intended) which served to amplify the lunacy going on around him. Kendall’s scenes are few but cherce. There are a ton of Doctor films, are any of the rest of them worth seeing?

EVERGREEN (1934), director Victor Saville, with Jessie Matthews, Sonnie Hale, Betty Balfour. A very high budget (for the UK) 30s musical starring über-charming Jessie Matthews. The “Homage to Brigitte Helm” number has to be seen to be believed. I’m not a big musicals fan, but no film with La Matthews wastes my time.

FAST AND LOOSE (1952), director Gordon Perry, with Kay Kendall, Brian Reece, Stanley Holloway. Another Netflix offering with Kay Kendall, available for streaming. Missed trains and marital misunderstandings, bookended by the malevolence of two classic battleaxes, eventually mount to operatic disaster in this marital farce. Holloway is hilarious and Kendall is a joy.

GHOST SHIP (1952), director Vernon Sewell, with Hazel Court, Dermot Walsh. Oooh, a British film about a haunted ship, starring Hazel Court no less, thinks I! It must be all M.R. James-like, thinks I! Understated, evocative black and white photography, horror suggested but ultimately left to the imagination, possible frissons, thinks I! Well this was not that film, not by a long shot, buster! The rock-bottom budget was not ameliorated by anything resembling creativity, intelligent writing, competent story construction, or clever production values. I’ve been more frightened by things I’ve found in my refrigerator. Of passing interest were short appearances by the excruciatingly young Ian Carmichael and Joss Ackland.

JOHNNY FRENCHMAN (1945), directed by Charles Friend, starring Patricia Roc, Francois Rosay, and Paul Dupuis. I liked this film a lot, although I grudgingly admit that Ms. Roc was a wee tad too glamorous to successfully portray a Cornish village maiden. Cornish fishermen have a sometimes-not-so-friendly competition with a cross-channel village of Breton fisherman, but learn to set aside their differences and cooperate during WWII. The film features lovely location scenery and a robust performance by Francois Rosay as the tough-minded Breton mamm.

MANDY (1952), directed by Alexander McKendrick, starring Phyllis Calvert, Jack Hawkins, and Terence Morgan. A well-meaning treatment of the problems that arise when a young couple discovers their beloved baby daughter is deaf. I think the film is marred by a couple of silly subplots but the performances are solid. I’d like to have Jim’s opinion on it.

THE PERFECT WOMAN (1949, director Bernard Knowles, with Patricia Roc, Stanley Holloway, Nigel Patrick. Upper class twit Nigel Patrick and his valet, the Jeeves-esque Stanley Holloway, get a job escorting what they think is a robot woman; it’s actually Patricia Roc pretending to be a robot and doing quite the nice job of it, too. Lots of frenetic fun, but the film is stolen by Pamela Devis playing the real robot.

THE YEARS BETWEEN (1946) director Compton Bennett, with Valerie Hobson and Michael Redgrave. I’d seen this some time ago and liked it quite a bit. This time around I found it more soapy than I’d remembered, but it's still a good film with a surprising ending, one not found in American films of the same time. Excellent performances by both leads.

THIS HAPPY BREED (1944), director David Lean, with Robert Newton, Celia Johnson, John Mills, Kay Walsh, and Stanley Holloway. Cavalcade set in one room, I liked it better than Cavalcade, but then I liked that thing in my refrigerator that frightened me better than Cavalcade. It was not a waste of time but if I never see it again I’m fine with that.

WHEN THE BOUGH BREAKS (1947), director Lawrence Huntington, starring Patricia Roc, Rosamund John, Bill Owen, and Brenda Bruce. Ms. Roc discovers that her husband is a bigamist; unfortunately she does so right after she’s given birth. Timing is everything. After trying to raise the baby alone she finally allows the little boy to be adopted. Fast forward a few years; she has a lovely husband but wants her child back. The film deals intelligently with its serious subject matter, even if it ends far more happily such cases often do in real life. It’s a movie, dammit.

Oh dear kit39q305ten on ke39t3-2&&&&&yboard.
Fred
"You love your children. It's your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.”
― Game of Thrones
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"
Offline
User avatar

mndean

  • Posts: 711
  • Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:04 pm
  • Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostWed Aug 01, 2012 9:56 pm

Pssst. Charles Frend and Alexander Mackendrick.

I pretty much agree about the two Leans, I couldn't get into either and I like quite a few postwar British films.
Offline

R Michael Pyle

  • Posts: 379
  • Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:10 pm

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostThu Aug 02, 2012 6:00 am

Please excuse this long-winded group of reviews, but I've taken them from another blog done over a period of a month or so of watching several Brit films: these were my reviews:

I watched "Meet Mr. Callaghan" (1954), a really wonderful (and possibly for British people nostalgic) British film about a down-and-out private detective, Slim Callaghan, played by Derrick de Marney, who suddenly gets a client at 11:00 at night, played by Harriette Johns, who thinks she'll be accused of the murder of her very wealthy stepfather - who at that moment is still alive! She puts five hundred pounds on de Marney's desk, and, of course, he takes the case! The film had opened, by the way, with de Marney's secretary walking out of the office in a huff because she hadn't been paid! The secretary, too, had wished de Marney the worst of luck! Well, the man does get killed, and de Marney becomes mired in the case and has to worm his way through things to get out of it! He's smarmy and not necessarily circumspect, but that's the charm of the film - and it reeks of charm - old-fashioned British charm that was part of nearly every film made there in the 30's, 40's, and 50's, up to the early part of the 60's.

This is considered by some a classic British detective film yarn. It certainly is a wonderful film. De Marney plays a character who has many similar facets of Sam Spade, although he's got a rather comical way about him instead of pure hard-boiledness. His disheveled hair and slight smile make him look as if he's had a couple drinks too many, but that's not the case, just the way he looks. By the way, he smokes so much that it's a wonder he doesn't go up in smoke himself!! Everybody in the film does the same, but his habit is almost annoying to watch today...

Also in the film are Peter Neil, John Longden, Frank Henderson, and Roger Williams as the four relations of the murdered man. Did one of them kill him?

Along for the ride are Larry Burns (playing a sort of side kick to de Marney called Darkey - the implication being that he is Moroccan), Belinda Lee, Delphi Lawrence, Trevor Reid (as the genuine detective who not only looks for the murderer, too, but hounds de Marney - of course!), and last, but certainly not least, Adrienne Corri. The last, by the way, plays a part seventeen years before she played the gang rape victim in Kubrick's "A Clockwork Orange" (which made her resent Kubrick for years on end because he filmed the scene over and over and over, and she had to be nude in the scene). Here she plays a singer in a club who knows more than she's telling. She's also about as sexy as it gets for the 1950's. My wife kept saying she sounds French when she was singing. Turns out in real life she's a Scot born of Italian parents. She was famous for her flaming red hair, although in this black and white print her hair actually appears quite dark!

In case the star's name isn't familiar on this side of the pond: try to go back seventeen years before this film was made to 1937. Hitchcock released a film called "Young and Innocent". Its stars were young Nova Pilbeam and a young Derrick de Marney. He still looks basically the same seventeen years later, but he's put some age on.

This film is part of a two DVD set with six films in it called "British Crime and Noir", and it's made for all regions. Very highly recommended!

I watched "Blackout" (1950), another British crime drama from a set of six films on 2 DVDs, "British Crime and Noir". This one stars Maxwell Reed and Dinah Sheridan, with Patric Doonan, Kynaston Reeves, Eric Pohlmann, Michael Evans, Annette D. Simmonds, Michael Brennan, and Ernest Butcher.

Fascinating premise: Maxwell Reed has been blind for eighteen months - we don't know why - and he's about to have an operation to correct that. He needs to go to 3 Linsdale Gardens to meet someone. A man named Tom takes him to his appointment, only he accidentally takes him to 3 Linsdale Place instead of 3 Linsdale Gardens around the corner. Reed is able to make his way without help, and he goes to the wrong house. Here he finds a murdered individual with a knife in his back. Three men confront him, and they discover he's blind. What they don't realize is that his hearing has become much more acute, and he remembers their voices. Let the story begin.

He eventually meets the sister of a flyer who supposedly was killed, but she's a twin, and she says that she has a feeling... She is the one who lives at 3 Linsdale Place, but she was on vacation when he 'visited' her house, and nobody was there...

Unable to convince anyone that a murder took place, he still gets his operation; his blindness is overcome; he begins to have a sort of relationship with the sister (Dinah Sheridan) who doesn't necessarily believe her brother was killed in any plane crash; together they begin doing some interesting research based on people who knew the brother. A ring Reed finds leads him to discover a man whose voice he recognizes from the time he was accidentally taken to what he thought was a murder scene...

Really neat little noir drama that doesn't let up from the get-go. Only drawback is the lead, Maxwell Reed. He's about as exciting as watching paint dry. But the plot and the rest of the cast, including baddie Eric Pohlmann (who's always a baddie!!), are wonderful.

Good speedy (73 minutes) little noir that is definitely worth the watch! If you like British crime mellers, this one's for you.

An interesting coda: Maxwell Reed was Joan Collins' first husband. He was a heartthrob of girls in the late 40's, early 50's. His wife, Collins, told him to base his acting style on James Mason. He, instead, based it on Stewart Granger. Why I'm mentioning this at all is because Margaret last night actually said, "He reminds me so much of Stewart Granger!" I thought that somewhat vindicated him, although, as I said, I thought he was about as exciting to watch as watching paint dry on a board. Tea for you and coffee for me...

I watched another British crime thriller, this one directed by Terence Fisher, a very fine British director known for episodes of the TV show "The Adventures of Robin Hood", plus known later for directing an entire group of horror films of note. I watched "Home to Danger" (1951), a really well done crime film with Guy Rolfe and Rona Anderson, along with Francis Lister, Alan Wheatley, Bruce Belfrage, Peter Jones, Dennis Harkin, and a very young Stanley Baker, the last of whom one could easily see why he became so famous later.

This one begins with Rona Anderson coming home after five years away. We find out she left because she had a serious disagreement with her father, and she went East. The plane which brings her home has someone announcing at the airport where it arrives that it is coming from the Far East. Anyway, we quickly learn that "your father committed suicide." Well, did he?

The nefarious characters in this piece are wonderfully realized. The pacing is perfect. The suspense build-up is impeccably realized. We finally discover that dope is at the bottom of all the trouble. The leader of the gang wants the daughter dead. Who's the leader of the gang?

The one thing that just is amazing is the photography! Reginald Wyer's cinematography is astonishingly beautiful. The film was shot in the English countryside, and it is gorgeously done. Just to see the English countryside in 1951 is worth the entire film. The original music for the film was done by none other than Malcolm Arnold.

All in all, a great film for a small "B" production. The lead, Guy Rolfe, is a very interesting person in his own right. He began as a race car driver, an amazing fact seeing as how he's a very tall individual! He also has Jack Palance's scull face, a gaunt and saturnine look if ever there was one. He's very good in this show. He would become even better known when he was in his late eighties (!) playing in a series of three slasher films! He died at 91, still acting.

I've really enjoyed this series of British crime films immensely. They're wonderfully done; each exciting and well written, and, for the most part, well acted. The direction of all of them has been exceptional. Three to go. There are six in total in this set called "British Crime and Noir. Look forward to the other ones in the near future.

I watched "No Trace" (1950), another British crime thriller from the set of six, "British Crime and Noir". Many people consider this one of the very best "B" films ever made in Britain. I agree that it's quite good, but I enjoyed the first three films I watched in the set better than this one. First of all, Hugh Sinclair is sometimes just plain boring. I've got him in a couple of other "Saint" films made in the early 40's, and, although he's good, he's no where near what George Sanders was. He's good looking, but not the criminal lead type. He looks constantly as if he might be depressed.

Anyway, this one has Sinclair as a crime novelist who has to kill a blackmailer so that his (Sinclair's) past won't come up. He's now a recognized writer and personality - from the radio - and his past includes escaping after committing a bad crime while spending some time in the United States. His other crime cronies in that venture ended up serving five years in prison. Well, one of them finds him and... The rest of the film shows us Sinclair trying to get out of the clutches of the blackmailer. He does, but... Like I said, good premise, good film, but would have been a whale of a better film with a stronger lead...

Also in the show are lovely Dinah Sheridan, John Laurie (one of my own personal favorite British actors), Dora Bryan, young Barry Morse, Michael Brennan (as the blackmailer), and others.

Nice quickey directed by John Gilling. What I most appreciated was the fact that at one point you see people driving up to and into Hyde Park, then just parking their cars at will. Try that one today!!!!!!!!! Yeah, sure...

Margaret and I watched what we consider one of the best thrillers we've seen in a long time, "Bond of Fear" (1956), about a family in Britain about to go on holiday driving a caravan (car with a trailer), and eventually going over to the coast of France. Before they go, a man who has committed murder is now on the loose, and he escapes from the clutches of the police. He ends up kidnapping the entire family at gunpoint, and the rest of the film is about the events that follow one upon another while they're on the road until there is resolution at the end. It's intense (for its day), extremely well directed - taut and not an instance of extra anything thrown in for good measure! - and well-acted. The family includes the father, played by lead Dermot Walsh, the mother, played by Jane Barrett, their son, played really excellently by Anthony Pavey, their daughter, played by Marilyn Baker, and the kidnapper and murderer, played to perfection by John Colicos. Colicos, who most on this board have probably seen in something or other at least once during their lives, specialized in really nasty characters. He has a certain sinister look about him that fits those parts like a glove.

One critic on the IMDb said that he thought the show was really excellent except for the ending, which he thought was too pat and unrealistic. I must tell you that I thought it couldn't have ended any other way! But then, that may be saying something about my age, too...

Really great "B" movie from the middle fifties in Britain. Great! From the six pack, 2 DVD selection "British Crime and Noir". More than highly recommended. This is in the same league as "Hitchhiker" (1950) and "The Desperate Hours" (1955), both classics of their sort; this deserves to be much, much better known. Only problem might be boring title...

Watched the last of six in a series of British crime and noir films that are on 2 DVDs in a set called "British Crime and Noir", this one called "Recoil" (1953), starring Kieron Moore, Elizabeth Sellars, and Edward Underdown. In this one, bad boy brother Kieron Moore and his gang rob a jeweler, but stab him to death, besides. The getaway car is eventually wrecked and burns, killing two of the thieves, but Kieron Moore, the head thief and the murderer, gets away. He goes back to his brother, a physician, to get fixed up from his injuries in the automobile accident. Meanwhile, Elizabeth Sellars, the daughter of the murdered jeweler, and who bumped into Kieron Moore as he was getting away from the murder, begins an earnest search for the killer.

Eventually, getting enough information, Elizabeth Sellars infiltrates the establishment where Kieron Moore lives, thinking maybe his brother was involved, too. She finally realizes that he is not involved, and she is in a sort of relationship with him, anyway.

Getting to this point is a good amount of the film, and though it is action filled, it is interestingly mainly a character study of all involved, and a good one for such a "B" film. Directed by John Gilling, who directed another couple of the films in this collection and wrote a couple of them, too, again this is taut and free of any fat, giving it a fine 79 minutes of good storytelling. No, it's not a classic in the vein of "39 Steps" or anything like that, but it's a well done show that deserves a fine reputation. Definitely worth the while to watch if you can find it, or it comes on television at some point. Elizabeth Sellars is a cutie for her day, and she's a fine actress, too. With her beautiful cheek bones, she ended up playing a lot of exclusive ladies in her career, countesses and the like. A Glaswegian by birth, she's now 89 years old and evidently retired from the screen.

Kieron Moore had a minor, but good, career, beginning with films after WW II, including playing Count Vronsky in the Vivien Leigh version of "Anna Karenina" (1948), and he was a member of the cast in "Darby O'Gill and the Little People" (1959), but he eventually retired and worked for the Catholic Church, making a couple of documentaries, too, about the third world.

Edward Underdown may be remembered by American audiences for his part in the monstrous film with Bogart, directed by John Huston, "Beat the Devil" (1954), made the year after "Recoil". His career began all the way back in 1934 in films, and he made some decent ones in a career that lasted until 1980. He was a noted stage actor, besides; and his television career was also notable, including episodes of "Upstairs, Downstairs", "Dr. Who", "The Duchess of Duke Street", "Dad's Army", and so forth.

I've enjoyed all six of the films in this set of 2 DVDs, and highly recommend any of the six films to any who enjoy crime or noir style films. These are all British, so Americans may not necessarily know the leads, but they'll still enjoy the shows immensely. They're all well directed, well written, and well acted. The set is called "British Cinema: Renown Pictures Crime and Noir", and Amazon.com right now has the set available here in America with new sets beginning as low as $10.99, or less than $2 per film!!

I watched an Academy Award film that never even had a chance to compete for an Academy Award - probably has been forgotten by nearly everybody, but certainly stands up to the very best of the Powell/Pressburger films. This film needs to be given a new kick-start and be seen by many more people. I haven't ever been so impressed by a film that I've never seen that has almost no critical history written about it!

The film is called "The Brothers" (1947), and it stars Will Fyffe, Patricia Roc, Maxwell Reed, Finlay Currie, John Laurie, Andrew Crawford, and John Macrae, with minor parts starring James Woodburn, Morland Graham, Megs Jenkins, David McAlister, and Patrick Boxill. The genuine star, however, may actually be the scenery, for this was filmed entirely on The Isle of Skye, Scotland, and the cinematography by Stephen Dade captures the essence of the remoteness and eerie mistiness of the place to perfection. I must admit my prejudice, as my remote ancestors are from this isle, and I've visited it many times with great attachment.

This is not a film for the person who doesn't like a Greek tragedy. It IS a Greek tragedy, only in the "modern" dress of 1900 Isle of Skye, Scotland, where it is set, and where the culture captured is encapsulated as if we are there watching. We are the chorus with our own emotions; the actors are the reaches of good and evil in all of us; the play simply the parts God has given them.

The story opens with a man of the faith picking up a girl from a ferry coming from the mainland, an orphan girl who has been raised in a convent, now coming to work for a living. She is going to be working for the Macraes, a widower father with two sons, a family who has a running feud with the clan McFarish. Just the setting alone of all this - in a crofters house with a small wall bed for the girl (played by Patricia Roc) - is a setup for inherent possible trouble. When she's eventually captivated by the son of the McFarish family, that's trouble enough; but when the Macrae father (played to uttermost perfection by Finlay Currie) is about to die, he notes to the oldest son that the younger son is smitten by the girl and should marry her. Then the father dies. But the older son, also smitten, says that the father mentioned that HE, the older son, should marry her. Then he sets up a conflict which leads ultimately to the denoument of Greek tragedy where all die.

I should note, too, that the Macrae clan makes their living ostensibly by crofting, but actually by bootleg whiskey made at illegal stills. This part of the story is only told in a cursory manner. It is part and parcel of the story, but not necessarily related as much to the story as to the environment of the story itself.

One absolutely fascinating (in a very morbid sense!) facet of the film is how an execution is carried out by these islanders. A large fish is tied to the head of a person who is put in a small boat, with the person bound at the feet and hands, and set adrift. The large gulls will attack the fish and literally eat the person's head!! It's gruesome beyond belief, but we don't actually see the person being killed. Maybe that's why the thought of people watching such a spectacle, and we, as spectators of those watching - only - but not seeing the spectacle itself - is so intensely gruesome!

I think this is one of the finest films - of its sort - ever made. It's almost totally unknown, although I discovered its existence by reading a book called Scotland in Film by Forsythe Hardy, published in 1990. His opening remarks about the film are these: "Uncomprimising is the keyword for "The Brothers". This was no prettified tale set against a picturesque Highland background, but a powerful story of love and hate among the crofters and fishermen of the West Coast."

Not only highly recommended, but GO LOOK FOR THIS. Unfortunately, it has been recently released in a complete and pristine version in the UK - but only in PAL format. No release in region 1 is available, that I know of.

I watched a wonderful sentimental tale which even won great critical reviews here in America back in 1938. Made completely in Scotland, the film is called "Owd Bob" (1938). The film is taken from a novel written by Alfred Ollivant, published in 1898, and it had already been made into a silent in 1924. (For the record, it was made twice more after the 1938 version, the latest in Germany in 1998.) This one stars the great Scottish actor, Will Fyffe, along with English actors John Loder and Margaret Lockwood. Interestingly enough, both Moore Marriott and Graham Moffat have pivotal parts, too; interesting because they'd made their mark together in several Will Hay comedies already, and this is not a comedy, nor their parts comedic necessarily, though there is subtle humor inherent in both characters.

We begin by seeing John Loder newly moved into the territory as a shepherd and sheep pasture owner, and the owner of his main sheep dog, Owd Bob. He happens, near the close of one end of the pasture pass, upon a group of angry souls, especially one, who are after and arguing with Will Fyffe, shepherd and tenant of the adjacent pasture, and owner of his sheep dog, Black Wull. They have come because they think Black Wull has mauled one of their sheep, and evidently not the first time at all.

This begins the story. Of course this natural bachelor - actually a widower, Fyffe - DOES have a daughter - that's right, it's Margaret Lockwood. She and Loder end up married. Her cantankerous father - Fyffe - and a more cantankerous individual you'd never meet! - and Loder end up going to the sheep fair where there is a yearly contest for the best sheep dog. Who'll win? Who do you think? Black Wull has won it four years running so far... The new dog, Owd Bob, has a good chance, though...

The ending of this piece is sad, too. The two newlyweds are fine, and all the humans are alive, but there is one piece of tragedy that, though seemingly sentimentally conceived by today's standards, is really touching, moving emotionally.

I loved this film. It is extremely well done, beautifully directed by Robert Stevenson and well acted by all concerned. The scenery is spectacular, although several scenes are obviously done on sound stages. The culture is well captured. A complaint, even back in 1938, is that Margaret Lockwood is so obviously English, not Scottish. It'll make no difference whatsoever to American audiences, although Scots watchers WILL, indeed, see/hear a major difference in dialect. This DVD is a newly restored version of the film, although it certainly could have been better restored; but I know from past viewings that the old copies have been from really lousy prints. My DVD is PAL.

Very highly recommended.

Last night we watched "The Card" (1952) with Alec Guinness, Glynis Johns, Valerie Hobson, and Petula Clark. Also in pre-eminent parts are Edward Chapman, Veronica Turleigh, George Devine, Gibb McLaughlin, and a pre-Miss Marple Joan Hickson in a part so far removed from Miss Marple as to make one look twice to see that it really is Joan Hickson! Look closely for early Michael Hordern and Wilfrid Hyde-White, too.

When one calls someone a 'card' in the US, one usually is referring to an individual who is comic, unsubtle, and probably off-the-wall. In the UK the same kind of definition applies, but more in the sense of a self-promoter, too. The US released the film as "The Promoter" when it came out, so we see the subtle differences in the use of a word.

This one has Alec Guinness beginning his days in the poor district, using his wiles to get to a fine school - where he's horrifically harrassed because his mother is a washerwoman - but nevertheless progressing, going further, graduating, getting a job as an assistant at a solicitor firm; progressing further and so forth through a Countess, meeting two other women along the way (all three women are the three leads besides Guinness), and ending up married to Petula Clark and becoming the Mayor of the borough of five cities!

Based on the novel by Arnold Bennett, this one begins in the late 1880's and progresses to about 1905 or possibly later. Really well done gentle comedy - the way only the British can do it. This one is SO British! If you like the gentle British comedy - of which Alec Guinness is a master! - you'll love this one. It begins by making sure the viewer is set-up well; that is, it begins somewhat slowly and meticulously, then gathers steam; then moves faster and faster until the end.

By the way, the boy at the beginning playing Alec Guinness as a youngster is his real life son, Matthew.

This is a PAL release, bought in England. Mucho recommended to those who love the late 40's, early 50's gentle comedies of Britain. You'll love Glynis Johns as a predator on men and their money - she's a hoot. Beautiful Valerie Hobson as the Countess is typical of the parts she could play. And, last but not least, Pet Clark is amiable in the part, though it's slightly short in scope, but nevertheless well done. Guinness - as usual - is flawless...
Offline
User avatar

drednm

  • Posts: 3160
  • Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:41 pm
  • Location: Belgrade Lakes, ME

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostThu Aug 02, 2012 10:42 am

Has Temptation Harbor (1947) ever surfaced?
Ed Lorusso
Writer/Historian
--------------------
"You're only as good as your last picture." Marie Dressler
Offline
User avatar

rudyfan

  • Posts: 1382
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:48 am
  • Location: San Fwancisco

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostThu Aug 02, 2012 11:10 am

Frederica wrote:Since we seem to be putting all our Britfilms in one Basket, I guess we might as well have more descriptive thread labeling. Through the kindness of friends (and Netflix) I’ve been feeding my burgeoning Britfilm addiction. Herewith is an updated report of some of the films I’ve seen over the past few months. You may talk amongst yourselves.

BLITHE SPIRIT, (1945), director David Lean, with Rex Harrison, Constance Cummings, Kay Hammond, and Margaret Rutherford. Hated the play, hated the movie. Awful people. You’re all on your own here.


See? I love Blithe Spirit. That they, each one, are unlikeable, they all get what they deserve in the end is delicious. Besides, I cannot resist Margaret Rutherford as Madame Arcati, she's simply brilliant.
Offline
User avatar

Frederica

  • Posts: 3239
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
  • Location: Kowea Town, Los Angeles

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostThu Aug 02, 2012 12:10 pm

mndean wrote:Pssst. Charles Frend and Alexander Mackendrick.


(COUGH!) Yeah, them.

I pretty much agree about the two Leans, I couldn't get into either and I like quite a few postwar British films.


In my case, it's not the Lean part I disliked, normally I quite like David Lean. It's Noel Coward I dislike.

There are a couple of Carol Reed films I left off this list, but it was getting too long as it was. Next round, maybe.
Fred
"You love your children. It's your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.”
― Game of Thrones
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"
Offline
User avatar

Frederica

  • Posts: 3239
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
  • Location: Kowea Town, Los Angeles

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostThu Aug 02, 2012 12:13 pm

R Michael Pyle wrote:Please excuse this long-winded group of reviews, but I've taken them from another blog done over a period of a month or so of watching several Brit films: these were my reviews:

(snip)


...(scribble, scribble) Derek de Marnay...(scribble)...Glynis Johns (scribble)...more Roc, more Roc!...(scribble)
Fred
"You love your children. It's your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.”
― Game of Thrones
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"
Offline
User avatar

bobfells

  • Posts: 1641
  • Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:03 pm
  • Location: Old Virginny

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostThu Aug 02, 2012 12:51 pm

I'm on a more narrowly focused British film kick at the moment, trying to catch up with Conrad Veidt's UK work. Some years ago I reviewed the five British George Arliss films and while they all had their moments, the last of them, DR. SYN (1937), is the only one I can enthusiastically recommend.

ROME EXPRESS (1932) said to be the granddaddy of all the "train" mystery films, it holds up very well against its later and more notable competition (THE LADY VANISHES). Sort of a "Grand Hotel" on rails, the ensemble cast is excellent with the charming villainy of Conrad Veidt (Jurta) overshadowed by Donald Calthrop's petty crook (Poole), who has the best role in the film. The card game that Jurta and Poole find themselves forced to play in is a highlight of the film since Jurta plans on killing Poole and Poole knows it. Maybe it's just me but Esther Ralston, who plays a Hollywood star, doesn't look much like her silent film self but then I haven't seen much of that work except for photos. Hugh Williams is the nominal hero who regrets his partnership with Jurta as he is inspired to go straight by Ralston. Sir Cedric Hardwicke plays a multi-millionaire philantropist who is really a miser and has a stormy relationship with his valet. Finlay Currie doesn't have much to do as Ralston's press agent but is hilarious with his "American" accent and Lee Tracey type personality ("This is the biggest thing since Julius Caesar was killed by the Ides of March!"). Former silent film comedian Walter Forde provides competent direction and the story has a kind of perverse humor as all the characters find their plans going wrong.

F.P. 1 (1933) is Curt Siodmak's sci-fi yarn of a floating platform (hence F.P. 1) in the mid-Atlantic to serve as a refueling and repair stop for trans-Atlantic flights. Later we'd call such structures aircraft carriers. Of course, a mysterious cabal of shipping tycoons wants to sabotage the project. This film is remembered more for the fact that it was made simultaneously in three languages and three different casts. Hans Albers played the hero in the German version (with Peter Lorre in support), Charles Boyar played the hero in the French version (now lost), and Conrad Veidt handles the English language version - with Donald Calthrop as his sidekick. Jill Esmond is the love interest and the nominal hero is played by Leslie Fenton, who designed FP 1 and captains it. German director Karl Hartl helmed all three versions. I'm not familiar with any of his other work but this is a very good film with the accent more on intrigue rather than suspense. Also, the sci-fi aspect is muted but the production values are impressive.

I just got in VCI's "remastered" JEW SUSS and I WAS A SPY but I haven't watched them yet.
Last edited by bobfells on Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Official Biographer of Mr. Arliss
"I eat nothing I can pat." George Arliss

http://ArlissArchives.com
http://OldHollywoodinColor.com
Offline

David Denton

  • Posts: 70
  • Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 8:28 pm

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostThu Aug 02, 2012 4:43 pm

I know it's not the point of this thread but the ex-silent comedian director of ROME EXPRESS was Walter Forde.He can be seen here:


and on Ben Model's site as well
Offline
User avatar

bobfells

  • Posts: 1641
  • Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:03 pm
  • Location: Old Virginny

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostThu Aug 02, 2012 5:42 pm

David Denton wrote:I know it's not the point of this thread but the ex-silent comedian director of ROME EXPRESS was Walter Forde.He can be seen here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV5sdtkjF40&feature=plcp" target="_blank" target="_blank

and on Ben Model's site as well


Thanks David. I went back and corrected my post. I also forgot to mention Sir Cedric Hardwicke in ROME EXPRESS.
Official Biographer of Mr. Arliss
"I eat nothing I can pat." George Arliss

http://ArlissArchives.com
http://OldHollywoodinColor.com
Offline
User avatar

Jim Roots

  • Posts: 1282
  • Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:45 pm
  • Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostWed Aug 29, 2012 1:09 pm

Frederica wrote:MANDY (1952), directed by Alexander McKendrick, starring Phyllis Calvert, Jack Hawkins, and Terence Morgan. A well-meaning treatment of the problems that arise when a young couple discovers their beloved baby daughter is deaf. I think the film is marred by a couple of silly subplots but the performances are solid. I’d like to have Jim’s opinion on it.


Your wish is my command!

It’s certainly a good movie, with a strong and often surprising script (surprising in how it deals with its own clichés in ways the standard Hollywood film wouldn’t consider), excellent acting, and I liked the adult way in which they handled the family issues. (Intrusive aside: Does anybody else think the actor playing Mandy’s grandfather looked like FDR?) Technically, the only thing that bothered me was the lighting in the first half -- it was almost a caricature of “symbolic chiaroscuro”, and I was very glad when they got over that film-class assignment and could just concentrate on doing a proper lighting job.

It’s very much a film of its time and place. Britain is the strongest bastion of the oralist approach to educating deaf children and always has been. That’s why Signing isn’t even considered an option in this film -- their choice is not between Signing and oralism (as it would be in Canada or the USA), it’s between oralism or not educating Mandy at all. Nevertheless, what the parents go through in struggling to make the choice is what nearly all parents of deaf children go through; even the risk of destroying their marriage is realistic and all too common.

The movie was personally touching for me because I have an adopted Deaf son who started life on a remote Native reserve and had absolutely zero language when he joined our family at age 5. That was too late, and as a consequence he will never have fluency in any language. We lost the next 6 years fighting to get ASL instruction for him, but even the so-called “Deaf program” in the local school insisted on using Signed English instead of ASL. Signed English requires that you already have language skills in English, which he didn’t, so it was useless for him.

He had trouble bonding with us, so we couldn’t enroll him in a distant Deaf school until those issues were resolved. Once he finally got into the (Signing) Deaf school, he became a totally different boy. ASL is his only language, and he isn’t a master of it because his language delays have resulted in what is clinically called “disorganized thinking”, but his life and personality have opened up. He won 7 awards in his first year at the school, including best role-model. He just came home from a Deaf summer camp a few weeks ago, and when I drove over to pick him up, three different counselors came over to me privately and raved about what a leader he was. By 1952 British standards, of course, he’s a complete and utter failure because he can’t speak -- that reason, and nothing else.

I’m very glad to have seen the film. It’s excellent, even if I have reservations about its one-sided approach to the communication issue. (And please, let's not debate that here!)

Jim
Offline
User avatar

Mike Gebert

Site Admin

  • Posts: 3416
  • Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:23 pm
  • Location: Chicago

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostSun Sep 16, 2012 3:37 pm

Not to go from the serious to the sublimely ridiculous, but...

Image

http://www.criterion.com/boxsets/921-ec ... h-pictures" target="_blank" target="_blank

Thought this was something people needed to know about. Due in October.

Anyone have good stills from any of these?
We should respect the other fellow's religion, but only to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is attractive and his children intelligent. —H.L. Mencken
Offline
User avatar

Frederica

  • Posts: 3239
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
  • Location: Kowea Town, Los Angeles

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostSun Sep 16, 2012 5:43 pm

Mike Gebert wrote:Not to go from the serious to the sublimely ridiculous, but...

http://www.criterion.com/boxsets/921-ec ... h-pictures" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank

Thought this was something people needed to know about. Due in October.

Anyone have good stills from any of these?


Oh GOODIE! (Capers around room, clapping hands in glee)
Fred
"You love your children. It's your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.”
― Game of Thrones
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"
Offline
User avatar

rudyfan

  • Posts: 1382
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:48 am
  • Location: San Fwancisco

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostSun Sep 16, 2012 5:58 pm

Frederica wrote:
Mike Gebert wrote:Not to go from the serious to the sublimely ridiculous, but...

http://www.criterion.com/boxsets/921-ec ... h-pictures" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank

Thought this was something people needed to know about. Due in October.

Anyone have good stills from any of these?


Oh GOODIE! (Capers around room, clapping hands in glee)



From she who collects nothing, that's saying something
Offline
User avatar

Frederica

  • Posts: 3239
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
  • Location: Kowea Town, Los Angeles

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostSun Oct 07, 2012 10:53 am

After a hiccup in September after purchasing a new Big-O-Vision I’ve continued my quest to watch All British Films, All the Time. I will try to write reviews for the films as time allows but one does have a life, you know.

For a change of pace I decided to watch two films I’d already seen, both based on books, one of which I’ve read many times, the other I had never read before. So I decided to read the books and then watch the films. Any reader can tell you this course of action is often fraught with peril. Books and films communicate narrative differently; directors and screenwriters who adapt books for screen walk a fine line, especially if the book is familiar to a wide audience. Too much reverence for the source material often makes for a ponderous film, too much deviance leaves the book’s fans wondering (with varying levels of hostility) “why didn’t you just make a western and leave the book alone?”

First up is GREEN FOR DANGER (1946), dir. Sidney Gilliat, with Alastair Sim, Trevor Howard, Leo Genn, Sally Gray, Megs Jenkins, Rosamund John, screenplay by Sidney Gilliat, based on the novel by Christianna Brand. Christianna Brand is considered one of the classic British mystery writers in the Christie/Sayers mold—novels are tightly plotted, characterization is kept to a minimum, and the mystery always revolves around an idiosyncratic Scotland Yard inspector or a Part-Time Sleuth interviewing a group of suspects who do nothing but act suspiciously and create red herrings. Although I am a mystery fan I find both Christie and Sayers almost unreadable; paradoxically I usually enjoy films derived from their books, since the facets that are so annoying in their novels often translate well to the screen. I’d not yet read any of Brand, so through the magic of Kindle’s Instant Gratification Delivery Platform I purchased the book, expecting to find Inspector Cockrill every bit as irritating as I find Hercule Poirot and Lord Peter Wimsey.

Close, but no aperitif. Inspector Cockrill is indeed idiosyncratic but he’s a darker character in the book than he is on screen. Gilliat tweaked the character to play to Alastair Sim’s (considerable) strengths. Sim’s Inspector Cockrill bumbles—and is charming at it, I might add—Brand’s Cockrill is not a bumbler, he’s actually rather a nasty little oick, successful at what he does mainly because of his unpleasantness. The suspects have a modicum of depth (I stress, a modicum), but the actors, Howard, Genn, et al., take that modicum and run with it.

The film, however, jettisons what is the book’s best attribute; the late wartime background, the aura of doomed ptsd-level anticipation in physicians and nurses working pell-mell to save as many lives as they can while scrambling for necessary supplies in a hospital targeted for enemy bombing runs. Stressing that background, however, would probably have made for a very disjointed film. Green for Danger the film is a great classic film whodunit. Green for Danger the book is a good one, but I still probably won’t read more of Christianna Brand. Green for Danger is available through Criterion; the NYTimes Review of the film is here:
http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review? ... 946693D6CF" target="_blank

Next up is THE RELUCTANT WIDOW, dir. Bernard Knowles, screenplay by Basil Boothroyd based on the novel by Georgette Heyer, starring Jean Kent, Guy Rolfe, and Paul Dupuis. Heyer is one of my favorite novelists ever. She was a master farceur, a clever, elegant wordsmith easily the equal of P.G. Wodehouse, and a formidable scholar who single-handedly created an entire branch of publishing that is still thriving in today’s imperiled industry. She is finally getting the critical respect she deserved throughout her life but never got because she wrote (GASP!) romances. Only two of her books have been translated to the screen, of which The Reluctant Widow is one.

The Reluctant Widow is one of my favorite Heyers, I’ve read it more times than I remember and I enjoy it every single time I read it. The Reluctant Widow the movie is a hot mess that wastes the considerable talents of Jean Kent and discards Heyer’s story and characterizations in favor of jumbled incoherency. Since Heyer was the most cinematic of writers this reader was left scratching her head and ruminating on westerns in a pained and pissed off fashion.

I had seen The Reluctant Widow before in a blurry grey-market vhs tape, I think recorded from television, with captions done in what looks to this untutored eye like Russian. It has not yet made it to dvd and I have no idea about its copyright status, but the film (minus one section) has been uploaded in entirety to youtube. Restoration will not help it, I’m afraid, and if it disappears altogether it is not a loss, but if you are a Heyer fan it might be worth an hour and a half of your time, especially if you need a quick boost in blood pressure.

The only other Heyer film adaptation is a German film entitled Die Bezaubernde Arabella, which I have not seen; I am keeping an eye on ebay for a copy, but as I don’t speak German it might not do me a bit of good if it’s not subtitled.

Bosley Crowther gave The Reluctant Widow a more-than-usually dyspeptic review in the NYTimes, here:
http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review? ... 838A649EDE" target="_blank

I could not agree with him more.
Fred
"You love your children. It's your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.”
― Game of Thrones
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"
Offline

Daniel Eagan

  • Posts: 297
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 7:14 am

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostSun Oct 07, 2012 6:54 pm

Thanks for the tip on Georgette Heyer. Would you recommend any other novels besides The Reluctant Widow? I guess her "Footsteps in the Dark" doesn't have anything to do with the Errol Flynn movie?

I wonder if you've read Margery Sharp and have an opinion about her. She's probably best known today for The Rescuers, but I really enjoy her adult novels, like Cluny Brown and The Foolish Gentlewoman.

Also curious why Angela Thirkell has never been adapted to the screen, as far as I know.
Offline

syd

  • Posts: 306
  • Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:55 am

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostSun Oct 07, 2012 9:25 pm

I consider Jesse Matthews among the most attractive
of British movie actresses from the 1930's.
A clip of her dancing compelled me to watch the
movie Evergreen some time ago.

I also saw Blithe Spirit with the incomparable
Rex Harrison.

With regards to my classic British film preferences, I am partial
to the films of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger,
the Ealing Studios output between the late 1940's and
mid 1950's (Kind Hearts and Coronets, The Lavender Hill
Mob etc.) and Hammer Horror.
Offline

R Michael Pyle

  • Posts: 379
  • Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:10 pm

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostMon Oct 08, 2012 6:23 am

Except for one or two little blips in the schedule, I've watched nothing except British films and TV for the last couple of months. Just finished the entire first season (six episodes) of "Doc Martin" with Martin Clunes. Witty, adult, eccentric, comic, and dramatic - by turns or all at the same time - this is marvelous!

I bought the first three sets of all the movies made from Edgar Wallace novels from 1960-1965. In this set of films, each film runs between 59-63 minutes in length. They were made on a shoestring budget (yet none of them really look it) by Merton Park Studios. The films were later cut to run about 52 minutes for American television where they aired during the later 1960's as "The Edgar Wallace Theater". These sets are all the original lengths and are totally restored. Set number four is now available. Altogether, there were 47 films made in this series. So far, I've watched five of them, and they've all been quite good for little films - and that's all they're meant to be.

Found (in France) a great release of "Red Ensign" (1934), an early Michael Powell directed film with Leslie Banks, Carol Goodner, and others, including John Laurie in a smaller part. You have to take off the French subtitles to watch strictly in English (which, of course, is how it was originally made!), but that's easy to figure out. I'm a huge Powell fan, a huge Leslie Banks fan, and a fan of John Laurie, to boot. Recently watched "The Fire Raisers" (1934), another Powell directed film that was so British, and very exciting.

By the way, if you've never seen "A Warm Corner" (1930) with Heather Thatcher, you're missing one of the funniest, most risqué films ever released. Notice I said risqué, not rude or prurient! If you can find it, by all means watch!
Offline
User avatar

Frederica

  • Posts: 3239
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
  • Location: Kowea Town, Los Angeles

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostMon Oct 08, 2012 8:59 am

Daniel Eagan wrote:Thanks for the tip on Georgette Heyer. Would you recommend any other novels besides The Reluctant Widow? I guess her "Footsteps in the Dark" doesn't have anything to do with the Errol Flynn movie?

I wonder if you've read Margery Sharp and have an opinion about her. She's probably best known today for The Rescuers, but I really enjoy her adult novels, like Cluny Brown and The Foolish Gentlewoman.

Also curious why Angela Thirkell has never been adapted to the screen, as far as I know.


Heyer's Footsteps in the Dark were part of her mystery series; she was a contemporary of Christie and Sayers, and wrote mysteries in that vein in addition to her romances. I read them years ago, have never felt any compelling interest in rereading them, but I believe those mysteries are liked...er...amongst the people who like that sort of thing. She is best known for her romances, though, and she sometimes combines romance and mystery, as in The Reluctant Widow. My personal favorite is The Grand Sophy, but I can also recommend The Talisman Ring, Frederica (yes, my online handle is taken from that book), Arabella, and Cotillion.

I have not read Margery Sharp, but I'll put her on my list. I have read Thirkell but it's been a long time.

Addendum: Michael Dirda included The Grand Sophy in his wonderful book, Classics for Fun.
Fred
"You love your children. It's your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.”
― Game of Thrones
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"
Offline
User avatar

Brooksie

  • Posts: 1315
  • Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:41 pm
  • Location: Portland, Oregon via Sydney, Australia

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostMon Oct 08, 2012 11:09 am

Georgette Heyer is most famous for her Regency romances, but does anyone know whether any of her mysteries have been filmed? If not, it's a crime, no pun intended. I could imagine Why Shoot A Butler as a terrific little mid-30s quota picture.
Offline
User avatar

Frederica

  • Posts: 3239
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
  • Location: Kowea Town, Los Angeles

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostMon Oct 08, 2012 12:10 pm

Brooksie wrote:Georgette Heyer is most famous for her Regency romances, but does anyone know whether any of her mysteries have been filmed? If not, it's a crime, no pun intended. I could imagine Why Shoot A Butler as a terrific little mid-30s quota picture.


Not according to the Heyer website, only two of the Regencies have been filmed, none of the mysteries. They would make a nice little Masterpiece Mystery series. There is a recent bio of Heyer (dating from 2011) which may discuss other efforts to film her work, but I haven't read it yet. She could be very touchy about her work.
Fred
"You love your children. It's your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.”
― Game of Thrones
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"
Offline

Richard M Roberts

  • Posts: 1385
  • Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostMon Oct 08, 2012 5:51 pm

R Michael Pyle wrote:.

Found (in France) a great release of "Red Ensign" (1934), an early Michael Powell directed film with Leslie Banks, Carol Goodner, and others, including John Laurie in a smaller part. You have to take off the French subtitles to watch strictly in English (which, of course, is how it was originally made!), but that's easy to figure out. I'm a huge Powell fan, a huge Leslie Banks fan, and a fan of John Laurie, to boot. Recently watched "The Fire Raisers" (1934), another Powell directed film that was so British, and very exciting.



RED ENSIGN is or was available over here in a three-film DVD from MPI called CLASSIC BRITISH THRILLERS with included it with an even better early MIchael Powell called THE PHANTOM LIGHT (1935) with Gordon Harker and a 1947 thriller with James Mason called THE UPTURNED GLASS. All three are worth watching, but THE PHANTOM LIGHT is one of my favorite Michael Powell films (I'm not so fond of him when he met Emeric Pressberger and went pretentious, but his early quota quickies and suspense thrillers are usually pretty good).


RICHARD M ROBERTS
Offline

R Michael Pyle

  • Posts: 379
  • Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:10 pm

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostMon Oct 08, 2012 7:38 pm

Thank you, Richard! I went ahead and ordered it. It's still available through Amazon.com. Only 6 left...
Offline
User avatar

Frederica

  • Posts: 3239
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
  • Location: Kowea Town, Los Angeles

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostTue Oct 16, 2012 9:28 am

If you suffer (as do I) from the occasional Gainsborough attack, you'll want to immediately purchase Criterion's new three-disc release of The Wicked Lady, Madonna of the Seven Moons, and The Man in Grey. I've only had a chance to peek at the films (well, except for The Wicked Lady, that peek morphed into watching it for the umpteenth time) but the quality on the dvds is exceptional. This allows you to focus on the really important stuff, like costuming, hair, and James Mason and Michael Rennie in feathered hats.
Fred
"You love your children. It's your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.”
― Game of Thrones
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"
Offline

R Michael Pyle

  • Posts: 379
  • Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:10 pm

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostTue Oct 16, 2012 12:12 pm

Frederica wrote:If you suffer (as do I) from the occasional Gainsborough attack, you'll want to immediately purchase Criterion's new three-disc release of The Wicked Lady, Madonna of the Seven Moons, and The Man in Grey. I've only had a chance to peek at the films (well, except for The Wicked Lady, that peek morphed into watching it for the umpteenth time) but the quality on the dvds is exceptional. This allows you to focus on the really important stuff, like costuming, hair, and James Mason and Michael Rennie in feathered hats.


I've already suffered and already ordered it!

Last night I watched "The Phantom Light" (1935), a quota quickie that still survives of Michael Powell, and it was simply fantastic. Several leitmotifs foreshadow "The Edge of the World" and "I Know Where I'm Going", both of which capture culture elements that separate Welsh culture from others. "The Phantom Light" is a Welsh story - sort of - that takes place preponderantly in a lighthouse. In reality the scenes in the lighthouse were filmed in Devon, and the rest filmed mostly in several places in Wales, then all was finished at Gainsborough in Islington, London. The scenes with Binnie Hale in borrowed pants - cut off up to her upper thighs to look much like modern hot pants - and high heels are worth every minute of time watching!! Really wonderful show - and great example of the quota quickie at its best!
Offline
User avatar

Frederica

  • Posts: 3239
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
  • Location: Kowea Town, Los Angeles

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostTue Oct 16, 2012 2:19 pm

R Michael Pyle wrote:Last night I watched "The Phantom Light" (1935), a quota quickie that still survives of Michael Powell, and it was simply fantastic. Several leitmotifs foreshadow "The Edge of the World" and "I Know Where I'm Going", both of which capture culture elements that separate Welsh culture from others. "The Phantom Light" is a Welsh story - sort of - that takes place preponderantly in a lighthouse. In reality the scenes in the lighthouse were filmed in Devon, and the rest filmed mostly in several places in Wales, then all was finished at Gainsborough in Islington, London. The scenes with Binnie Hale in borrowed pants - cut off up to her upper thighs to look much like modern hot pants - and high heels are worth every minute of time watching!! Really wonderful show - and great example of the quota quickie at its best!


I've got this set on my Classicflix queue, but it will probably take a while to get to me. I'm always on the lookout for films set in Wales. Bonus points if Welsh is spoken.
Fred
"You love your children. It's your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.”
― Game of Thrones
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"
Offline

R Michael Pyle

  • Posts: 379
  • Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:10 pm

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostTue Oct 16, 2012 2:52 pm

Frederica wrote:
R Michael Pyle wrote:Last night I watched "The Phantom Light" (1935), a quota quickie that still survives of Michael Powell, and it was simply fantastic. Several leitmotifs foreshadow "The Edge of the World" and "I Know Where I'm Going", both of which capture culture elements that separate Welsh culture from others. "The Phantom Light" is a Welsh story - sort of - that takes place preponderantly in a lighthouse. In reality the scenes in the lighthouse were filmed in Devon, and the rest filmed mostly in several places in Wales, then all was finished at Gainsborough in Islington, London. The scenes with Binnie Hale in borrowed pants - cut off up to her upper thighs to look much like modern hot pants - and high heels are worth every minute of time watching!! Really wonderful show - and great example of the quota quickie at its best!


I've got this set on my Classicflix queue, but it will probably take a while to get to me. I'm always on the lookout for films set in Wales. Bonus points if Welsh is spoken.

You'll earn bonus points. In the first half a great amount of humor is engaged with Welsh speaking. You may think you've died and gone to Heaven...
Offline
User avatar

Frederica

  • Posts: 3239
  • Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
  • Location: Kowea Town, Los Angeles

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostTue Nov 20, 2012 10:48 am

My Kay Kendall quest continues.

Simon and Laura (1955), Dir: Muriel Box, with Kay Kendall, Peter Finch, Ian Carmichael, Muriel Pavlow, Maurice Denham. Bickering unemployed actors Kendall and Finch are hired to do a daily BBC show, loosely based on their own “idyllic” marriage. (There are some parallels to the Lucy show, but I suspect the model is a UK show of which I know nothing.) The humor is dry and the insider view of the BBC’s late ‘50s seat-of-the-pants production is affectionate. Finch has always bored me spitless and this film did not cause me to reassess that view, but Kendall is, as usual, a joy.

The Reluctant Debutante (1958), Dir: Vincente Minnelli, with Rex Harrison, Kay Kendall, Sandra Dee, John Saxon, Angela Lansbury. What a repellent film. The studio system, coughing up blood in 1958, regurgitated film after film just like this one, desperately trying to attract the young and hip. In this bland, unfunny effort, practiced comic actors Kendall and Harrison support starlets Dee and Saxon. In what universe is that a good idea? On the plus side, the costuming was ravishing--you could hang anything on Kendall and she'd make it look great. Nevertheless I’ll take great care never to see it again.

Through the kindness of a fellow NitrateVillain, I was able to see two of the UK This is Your Life programs, the first honoring Chili Bouchier (with an appearance by a very soignée Patricia Roc) and the second for Patricia Kirkwood, who must have had a portrait hidden in her closet. Much fun to watch and since I have very little biographical information on UK stars it was all new to me. And factually trustworthy, I’m sure.

I have a stack of UK films still sitting by my spiffy new Slim-O-Vision, with any luck I’ll get to them SOON.

Thus endeth the report.
Fred
"You love your children. It's your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.”
― Game of Thrones
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"
Offline
User avatar

Mike Gebert

Site Admin

  • Posts: 3416
  • Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:23 pm
  • Location: Chicago

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostTue Nov 20, 2012 11:41 am

I was trying to think the other day what movie made Peter Finch famous. He was very popular-- he won the BAFTA best actor award five times (!)-- but the only movies I could think of were late ones like Sunday Bloody Sunday and Network. I guess he's in The Nun's Story, too, but you'd hardly call it his movie. (That, by the way, is an unusually good movie in an unusually bad genre, and I'n convinced it's where a lot of the first half of Full Metal Jacket comes from.)

Anyway, what was he in that he's famous for?
We should respect the other fellow's religion, but only to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is attractive and his children intelligent. —H.L. Mencken
Offline
User avatar

missdupont

  • Posts: 1515
  • Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:48 pm
  • Location: California

Re: The British Film Review and Discussion Thread

PostTue Nov 20, 2012 12:09 pm

He was in THE PUMPKIN EATERS with Anne Bancroft and James Mason.
Next

Return to Talking About Talkies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Christopher Jacobs and 1 guest