Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:13 pm
I'm confused! I thought the WB discs were made-to-order (MOD); that is, they are "burned" rather than pressed. So I thought your complaint was that the MOD discs were perhaps less stable than a pressed disc.
From what little I know about DVD's, the pressed discs (if manufactured correctly) are supposed to be more stable than a burned disc. That's because the pressed disc is created by a physical process which should be irreversible, unless the aluminum media degrades or the disc is scratched. The burned disc is created by a chemical process involving heat that is supposedly not quite as permanent, and can revert back to its original state. So the pressed copy is supposed to be more stable than a burned copy. But in your last post, you suggest making a burned copy of a pressed disc, which you think might be better. Can you clarify?
It also sounds like your problem isn't the DVD media, whether pressed or burned, but that the intial copy itself was poorly made, possibly because the master was bad. Fortunately, it doesn't matter since WB is apparently willing to replace the discs, or is already in the process of doing so. SETH
"Novelty is always welcome, but talking pictures are just a fad." -- Irving Thalberg