Little Women
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 3:04 pm
My blog article on the silent versions of Little Women.
https://silentroomdotblog.wordpress.com ... ent-women/
https://silentroomdotblog.wordpress.com ... ent-women/
Talking, collecting and preserving classic film.
https://www.nitrateville.com/
Hi, Ed.drednm wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 3:04 pmMy blog article on the silent versions of Little Women.
https://silentroomdotblog.wordpress.com ... ent-women/
Meryl Streep is now a classic character actress.Harlowgold wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:45 amA touch off topic, but am I the only one who is disappointed the great Meryl Streep plays Aunt March in the new version? IMO this part should always go to a classic character actress, as it has in the past with Edna May Oliver, Lucile Watson, Elizabeth Patterson, Mildred Natwick, and Mary Wickes. I was fine with Greer Garson in the tv version from 1978 given how rare it was to see her act in that era but Meryl is just too big for this part.
I was going to say just about that.WaverBoy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:52 pmMeryl Streep is now a classic character actress.Harlowgold wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:45 amA touch off topic, but am I the only one who is disappointed the great Meryl Streep plays Aunt March in the new version? IMO this part should always go to a classic character actress
Well, she's certainly old enough to be one (she's two decades older(!) than Edna May when she played the role) but she's still a star and will undoubtably be playing many more leads in the future. I'd compare her today to where Katharine Hepburn was 1967-1975, a senior citizen yes, but a very big box office name. My point was this is a nice little role for a non-b.o. draw actress to shine in and it seems a major waste of Meryl's star power to put her in it (though she was no doubt compen$ated) and at a time when what few Olivers and Watsons and Wickes we have today rarely get a shine it seems a bit not right and one can't help but wonder if the producers thought Meryl in this little part would be an easy 56th Oscar nomination for her as Best supporting actress since this category has been taken over in the last twenty years by major stars playing smaller (and often dubiously "supporting" roles) roles just at a presumed easier shot for an Oscar for the mantle. Big stars now usually take up the majority of slots in the supporting categories while the non-star actor has hardly a chance at an Oscar now.WaverBoy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:52 pmMeryl Streep is now a classic character actress.Harlowgold wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:45 amA touch off topic, but am I the only one who is disappointed the great Meryl Streep plays Aunt March in the new version? IMO this part should always go to a classic character actress, as it has in the past with Edna May Oliver, Lucile Watson, Elizabeth Patterson, Mildred Natwick, and Mary Wickes. I was fine with Greer Garson in the tv version from 1978 given how rare it was to see her act in that era but Meryl is just too big for this part.
Yes I saw that also. It's probably why Edna May was the youngest of the Aunts March.Harlowgold wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:24 pmI was surprised recently to read in the AFI 1930's books that Edna May was an emergency replacement for Louise Closser Hale, who was originally cast as Aunt March but died during the production, especially since this role seems tailor-made to EMO and she was an RKO contractee (they borrowed Ms. Hale from MGM). I guess RKO initially felt Edna May was too valuable a draw to waste in the small part but asked her to step in so the production could continue. I've never read this story anywhere else; AFI credits trade papers for the information.
Ricardo wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:16 pmI have not owned this, but seems this is the 1918 version on DVD.
Good luck!
Ricardo
https://www.amazon.com/-/pt/dp/B013J8EJ ... -tv&sr=1-2
More likely a stupid mistake than a deliberate deception, since the external vendor Amazon was fronting for had actually printed up keepcases and discs with original publicity artwork from the 1918 version and was shipping them out to customers -- even though the discs actually contained the TV episode instead!drednm wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:39 pmRicardo wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:16 pmI have not owned this, but seems this is the 1918 version on DVD.
Good luck!
Ricardo
https://www.amazon.com/-/pt/dp/B013J8EJ ... -tv&sr=1-2
FAKE... This is actually a segment of LW from STUDIO ONE IN HOLLYWOOD (1950) starring Nancy Marchand as Jo.
never understood the fascination with Streep. And this going back to films like The French Lt's Woman(1982). I appreciated her in tv's 1978 Holocaust series.Harlowgold wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:45 amA touch off topic, but am I the only one who is disappointed the great Meryl Streep plays Aunt March in the new version? IMO this part should always go to a classic character actress, as it has in the past with Edna May Oliver, Lucile Watson, Elizabeth Patterson, Mildred Natwick, and Mary Wickes. I was fine with Greer Garson in the tv version from 1978 given how rare it was to see her act in that era but Meryl is just too big for this part.