Page 1 of 1

Silent Film Updated

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:55 pm
by salus
Has anyone ever taken an old silent film colorized it and put sound to the characters, with todays technology it would be interesting to see if it was watchable or entertaining?

Re: Silent Film Updated

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:59 pm
by boblipton
Dance Hall (1929) looks like the dialogue and sound effects were goat glanded onto it.

Bob

Re: Silent Film Updated

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:17 pm
by Little Caesar
I read on another forum that Chuck McCann is trying to negotiate with the heirs of Richard Feiner to do a series of colorized and dubbed versions of the Laurel and Hardy silents (I can almost here Ollie saying in response to this: "Well , here's another nice mess you've gotten me into").

Re: Silent Film Updated

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:55 pm
by Gagman 66
:shock: Uhg! I would rather have sound films made into Silents. Adding dialogue is incredibly stupid. It's been done before and it was horrible. All the artistic merit is lost. Parish Forbid.

Re: Silent Film Updated

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 12:38 pm
by silentfilm
McCann successfully did this for Laurel & Hardy's Double Whoopee, but normally this would really interfere with the pace and rhythm of a film. Usually a silent film didn't have the full speech of a character's lines. We'd see their mouth move, see the title of their dialogue, and then see the final syllables of the line.

It's an interesting experiment, but just as bad as colorizing a film, which greatly alters the original work.

Re: Silent Film Updated

Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2013 5:23 am
by Wm. Charles Morrow
Little Caesar wrote:I read on another forum that Chuck McCann is trying to negotiate with the heirs of Richard Feiner to do a series of colorized and dubbed versions of the Laurel and Hardy silents (I can almost here Ollie saying in response to this: "Well , here's another nice mess you've gotten me into").
Strikes me as pointless. Who is the intended audience for this? People who reject black & white movies because they're black & white, or silent movies because they're silent, aren't going to become interested in Two Tars just because it's been "updated" with color and sound. They'll reject it anyway because it's old.

Re: Silent Film Updated

Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 10:34 am
by poul
Sacrilege!

Re: Silent Film Updated

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:42 am
by Nosferatu
Gagman 66 wrote::shock: Uhg! I would rather have sound films made into Silents. Adding dialogue is incredibly stupid. It's been done before and it was horrible. All the artistic merit is lost. Parish Forbid.
I watch many modern movies and imagine them being better in silent format. For that matter, many would be better in black and white.

I can't stand the narration over The Iron Mask Douglas Fairbanks that I saw. It ruins the memory of the movie. It took a long time to get the memories out of my head so they didn't come into my memory when I watched the movie again. I'd hear the narration as I was watching the silent movie. Might as well eat a piece of dog shit while your watching it. I've also seen something similar call Apollo boy? something like that with Don Juan John Barrymore movie. Horrible.