Page 1 of 1

Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:30 am
by Bruce Long
During the silent film era, it was rare for prominent insiders to criticize the beauty of the female stars. One of few to do so, Penrhyn Stanlaws was a well-known portrait painter who had also directed several films for Paramount.

Stanlaws wrote an article appearing in the January 1923 issue of Screenland titled, "What's the Matter with Our Hollywood Women?", comparing some of the top female stars to his artistic ideal of beauty.
http://www.archive.org/stream/Screenlan ... 6/mode/1up
Among the stars criticized in Stanlaws' article were Mary Pickford, Mae Murrary, Alla Nazimova, Pola Negri, Betty Compson, Gloria Swanson, Pauline Frederick, Betty Blythe, Claire Windsor, Ruth Roland, Marion Davies, Bebe Daniels, Lila Lee, Viola Dana, Shirley Mason, Anita Stewart Marie Prevost, Wanda Hawley, Clara Kimball Young, Mary Miles Minter, Agnes Ayres, May Allison, Phyllis Haver, Coleen Moore, May McAvoy, Norma Talmadge, Constance Talmadge, Enid Bennett, Hope Hampton, Lillian and Dorothy Gish.

A subsequent issue of Screenland had this amusing tidbit: "All Hollywood chuckled when the Los Angeles Herald, a Hearst publication, reprinted from the January SCREENLAND the Penrhyn Stanlaws story, What's the Matter with Our Hollywood Women--and left out all mention of Mr. Stanlaws' criticism of Marion Davies, Cosmopolitan star..." :wink:

Stanlaws would never direct another Hollywood film. A 1933 newspaper article reported, "In 1922 Stanlaws lost his job as a Hollywood director because he spoke out on Hollywood's pulchritude." But in the same article Stanlaws was still speaking out, criticizing the beauty of current 1933 stars including Mae West, Greta Garbo, Katherine Hepburn, and Jean Harlow.
http://www.fultonhistory.com/Newspaper% ... 207144.pdf

He continued his portrait painting career, and Stanlaws' movie star portraits appeared on the cover of many movie fan magazines, particularly New Movie Magazine.

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:58 am
by Frederica
Bruce Long wrote:During the silent film era, it was rare for prominent insiders to criticize the beauty of the female stars. One of few to do so, Penrhyn Stanlaws was a well-known portrait painter who had also directed several films for Paramount.

Stanlaws wrote an article appearing in the January 1923 issue of Screenland titled, "What's the Matter with Our Hollywood Women?", comparing some of the top female stars to his artistic ideal of beauty.
http://www.archive.org/stream/Screenlan ... 6/mode/1up
Among the stars criticized in Stanlaws' article were Mary Pickford, Mae Murrary, Alla Nazimova, Pola Negri, Betty Compson, Gloria Swanson, Pauline Frederick, Betty Blythe, Claire Windsor, Ruth Roland, Marion Davies, Bebe Daniels, Lila Lee, Viola Dana, Shirley Mason, Anita Stewart Marie Prevost, Wanda Hawley, Clara Kimball Young, Mary Miles Minter, Agnes Ayres, May Allison, Phyllis Haver, Coleen Moore, May McAvoy, Norma Talmadge, Constance Talmadge, Enid Bennett, Hope Hampton, Lillian and Dorothy Gish.
Wow. Ew. Mr. Stanlaws was kinda creepy.

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:05 am
by sc1957
The Mr. Blackwell of his time. I suppose there always has to be one.

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:18 am
by bobfells
Did Stanlaws ever name stars he thought were beautiful? He seems to have dissed every important star of the 20s. My guess is the he was starved for attention and of course as a painter he could be hired to "correct" any facial deficiencies either real or imagined.

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:38 am
by greta de groat
How pathetic--an artist with such exacting standards that he can't appreciate beauty.

On some of those, i wonder if he was just making stuff up--he has that elaborate description of Agnes Ayres "faults" but doesn't notice her prominent overbite?

What on earth are "muscle-bound hips"?

greta

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:52 am
by Frederica
greta de groat wrote:How pathetic--an artist with such exacting standards that he can't appreciate beauty.

On some of those, i wonder if he was just making stuff up--he has that elaborate description of Agnes Ayres "faults" but doesn't notice her prominent overbite?

What on earth are "muscle-bound hips"?

greta
This article is followed by one entitled "Men Who Are Easy to Love!" Which I note, is not by Penhryn Stanlaws. Is that an oblique commentary on Mr. Stanlaws' obsessive critical focus on female body parts, or is it just an extra layer of creepy? "No analysis of masculine charms would be complete without an ode to Wallie Reid's eyebrow." That's got to be a joke!

Right? Right?? Please tell me that's a joke.

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:33 pm
by Bruce Long
bobfells wrote:Did Stanlaws ever name stars he thought were beautiful? He seems to have dissed every important star of the 20s....
According to the end of the article, the Feb. 1923 issue of Screenland would have a follow-up Stanlaws article in which: "...I will discuss some of the points of perfection possessed by famous women of the film world. I will select a group which has the greatest number of perfect forms and faces and from them analyze their screen appeal by the difficult standard of true physical symmetry."

I haven't seen that issue, but some other web pages indicate Stanlaws said the most perfect type on the screen was Madge Bellamy.

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:32 pm
by Frederica
Bruce Long wrote:
bobfells wrote:Did Stanlaws ever name stars he thought were beautiful? He seems to have dissed every important star of the 20s....
According to the end of the article, the Feb. 1923 issue of Screenland would have a follow-up Stanlaws article in which: "...I will discuss some of the points of perfection possessed by famous women of the film world. I will select a group which has the greatest number of perfect forms and faces and from them analyze their screen appeal by the difficult standard of true physical symmetry." But I haven't seen that issue.
Hrrrmmpphh. I think the famous women of the film world should have been allowed equal time to dissect Mr. Stanlaws' "points of perfection" and analyze his appeal "by the difficult standard of true physical symmetry." Then they can relax and compose an ode to Wallace Reid's eyebrow.

What a silly man.

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:24 pm
by Brooksie
greta de groat wrote:What on earth are "muscle-bound hips"?
Apparently he also thought Kay Francis was OK, but was offended by her `overdeveloped triceps'. How she walked out of the house like that every day, I don't know.

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:47 pm
by Frederica
Brooksie wrote:
greta de groat wrote:What on earth are "muscle-bound hips"?
Apparently he also thought Kay Francis was OK, but was offended by her `overdeveloped triceps'. How she walked out of the house like that every day, I don't know.
I don't know why all those women even bothered to breathe.

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 3:57 pm
by N_Phay
"Colleen Moore is exceptional in that she really has no beauty" hahaha WHAT???

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 4:14 pm
by Christopher Jacobs
N_Phay wrote:"Colleen Moore is exceptional in that she really has no beauty" hahaha WHAT???
Maybe he thought she was merely "cute," which isn't quite the same. But some people certainly do have peculiar personal standards of pulchritude and aren't afraid to proclaim them as if everyone else should agree! It would be interesting to see his reactions to today's stars.