Oh my God!! Can you believe this... I actually watched "OUR DANCING DAUGHTERS" on my old DVD-R that someone from the US had copied for me in 2005! I've not watched it since then really??? Anyway, I put it on and was really disappointed with the quality, it was terrible. Loads of dirt particles everywhere, soft picture, jump splices, no stabilization of picture.azjazzman wrote:Yay, Our Blushing Brides! I can't understand why they don't make a nice boxed set or package of the three Our Something Something films. From memory, the Warner Archive print of Our Dancing Daughters was a tad soft. Restoration? Well, we can dream ...
As far as I know, all prints of OUR DANCING DAUGHTERS are soft. I've seen a very old 16mm rental print and it was the same. Unless there is archival material sourced from a different 35mm print, I don't believe there is anything better.
Yep, and all existing prints of OUR DANCING DAUGHTERS have that printed in hair, too. MGM gets kudos for instituting a program fairly early on to transfer all their nitrate to safety film, but sad to say, their lab work was not all that great. I knew a fellow who worked in the MGM lab back in the 1960s and 70s and he said a lot of the work was rushed. MGM wanted the stuff copied, but they wanted it done quickly and spending the least amount of money.
The OUR DANCING DAUGHTERS nitrate was already starting to go and all that we are left with is the print you see on the Warner Archive DVD.
And YES -- I saw that "printed in Hair" that you mention in the bottom left hand corner of the screen!! I thought it was just my copy -- but you say it's actually on the official Warner Archive Collection copy too!??!?! That's really bad isn't it! I wonder why "Dancing Daughters" is in such bad condition, whereas the other two, "Modern Maidens" and "Blushing Brides" are in excellent condition?? Weird?