It was an unashamed thrill picture, and apparently somewhat grotesque - some reviews compared it to Edgar Allan Poe - but one sequence in particular gained enormous interest.
Through various plot convolutions, a trained chimpanzee makes off with a baby, carrying it first to the roof of a house, and then up an enormous smokestack - UK reports claimed it was 300 feet tall; it increased to 360 feet in American publicity. The fire brigade arrives, but their ladders are too short. A lady trapeze artist volunteers to climb up and save the kid. The action moves to the top of the smokestack, where the baby is sitting perilously close to the edge. The acrobat is attacked by the monkey, a fight ensues, and the unfortunate animal plummets to his death.
Newspapers published a few photographs, which I'm assuming is all that is left of this sequence:

Promotions focused strongly on the absolute veracity of the sequences - no safety nets, no special effects, filmed from a neighbouring smokestack using a telephoto lens. Doubtful as they were, the point was to emphasise a climax - in which a monkey takes a vulnerable human up an impossibly high structure and is attacked until he falls - as the biggest and scariest thrill sequence to date. It was well known enough for several different chimps to tour vaudeville in Australia and America, advertised as being the one from the movie.
My question is this: is it too rash to wonder whether Merian C. Cooper saw the film? I've read about many antecedents of King Kong, but I don't think I've ever heard The Masque of Life or any of its variations mentioned amongst them. Has anybody else? Or am I reading too much into it?



