"Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Book.”

Post news stories and home video release announcements here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Brooksie
Posts: 3984
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:41 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon via Sydney, Australia
Contact:

"Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Book.”

Post by Brooksie » Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:25 am

The current edition of Newsweek has a long and interesting expose on sometime film biographer C. David Heymann's serious lapses in his books about Marilyn Monroe, Barbara Hutton and others. A cautionary tale for anyone who has ever argued that 'it must be true, because it's in a book'.

http://www.newsweek.com/2014/09/05/c-da ... 66876.html

User avatar
Harlowgold
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:06 pm

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by Harlowgold » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:33 pm

Congratulations to Newsweek for finally being the first major publication in my knowledge to take on one of these characters who for years write extraordinarily dubious "biographies" to the apparent indifference of their publishers whether they are true or not. There are of course several other rivals to this guy whose works need such serious scrutiny.

User avatar
George O'Brien
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:10 pm
Location: An Atoll in the Pacific

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by George O'Brien » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:05 pm

When Esther Williams wrote her auto biography she stated as fact that her late husband actor Jeff Chandler had been a cross dresser. Incidents were described. She later admitted that it was all made up. She alleged that her publisher pressured her to write such things in order to generate sales.
"This bar of likker is now a bar of justice!"

User avatar
telical
Posts: 1170
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by telical » Sat Jan 09, 2016 5:32 pm

George O'Brien wrote:When Esther Williams wrote her auto biography she stated as fact that her late husband actor Jeff Chandler had been a cross dresser. Incidents were described. She later admitted that it was all made up. She alleged that her publisher pressured her to write such things in order to generate sales.
That is atrocious that she would lie about it, I'm not making a value judgment on the act itself. I put just as much blame on her as I do her publisher. But, I still wanted to know who the publisher was. It was published later than I thought.
Wikipedia has:

"She co-wrote her autobiography The Million Dollar Mermaid (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1999) with popular media critic and author Digby Diehl."
--
Robert Pearson
http://www.paramind.net" target="_blank
http://www.telicalbooks.com" target="_blank
http://www.regenerativemusic.net" target="_blank

User avatar
Brent
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 9:59 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by Brent » Sat Jan 09, 2016 6:18 pm

What a filthy, immoral liar that C. David Heymann was. He makes Kenneth Anger look like a rank amateur. That really is a brilliant article; between that and the recently-discussed one on Mickey Rooney, I'm beginning to have hope for the future of journalism. Thank you for posting the link.

User avatar
telical
Posts: 1170
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by telical » Sat Jan 09, 2016 9:42 pm

From the Newsweek article:

"On its website, CBS urges teachers to assign to schoolchildren Heymann’s book about the alleged affair between Bobby Kennedy and Jackie Kennedy. CBS says the book is based on “impressive sources and impeccable insight” so that readers “finally get behind-closed-doors access to the emotional connection between these two legendary figures. An open secret for decades among Kennedy insiders, their affair emerges from the shadows in an illuminating book that only” Heymann could have produced."

It's amazing how damaging this man's life has been to the world. And, it's interesting how such big players are implicated
in his crime.
--
Robert Pearson
http://www.paramind.net" target="_blank
http://www.telicalbooks.com" target="_blank
http://www.regenerativemusic.net" target="_blank

User avatar
Changsham
Posts: 805
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:34 pm

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by Changsham » Sun Jan 10, 2016 12:42 am

So who are the biggest rogues, the dodgy authors or shameless publishers? Such a cheap shot against those who are not around to defend themselves.

User avatar
Brent
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 9:59 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by Brent » Sun Jan 10, 2016 12:34 pm

Didn't you read the article? He had over three decades of being able to defend himself but chose not to. Instead he continued churning out lies for the price of (I hope) his soul. That conglomerates are immoral is not a revelation: always have been, always will be. This is about a particular individual's irresponsibility and greed.

User avatar
Brooksie
Posts: 3984
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:41 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon via Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by Brooksie » Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:10 pm

Changsham wrote:So who are the biggest rogues, the dodgy authors or shameless publishers? Such a cheap shot against those who are not around to defend themselves.
I agree that it would have been preferable that the guy be exposed while he was still around - given the trail of evidence, it's peculiar that he wasn't - but the blame surely has to be shared equally between publisher and author. Even if the author was encouraged by his publisher to create a more sensationalist product, he went along with it; even if the publishers were aware of the author was fabricating his evidence, they went along with it.

At least the advent of the internet makes it more difficult for people to get away with this kind of subterfuge. In the case of one recent controversial publication that I'm aware of, a number of people made clear on their blogs or Facebook pages that they had advised the author he was on the wrong track but both he and his publisher pushed on regardless. The word is able to get out there in some form.

Scott Eckhardt
Posts: 447
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:36 am

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by Scott Eckhardt » Mon Jan 11, 2016 8:19 pm

telical wrote:
George O'Brien wrote:When Esther Williams wrote her auto biography she stated as fact that her late husband actor Jeff Chandler had been a cross dresser. Incidents were described. She later admitted that it was all made up. She alleged that her publisher pressured her to write such things in order to generate sales.
That is atrocious that she would lie about it, I'm not making a value judgment on the act itself. I put just as much blame on her as I do her publisher. But, I still wanted to know who the publisher was. It was published later than I thought.
Wikipedia has:

"She co-wrote her autobiography The Million Dollar Mermaid (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1999) with popular media critic and author Digby Diehl."
I read that book, and at the time there were several anecdotes that I thought were suspect, including one about producer Joe Pasternak eating spaghetti with his hands.

User avatar
Harlett O'Dowd
Posts: 2444
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:57 am

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by Harlett O'Dowd » Tue Jan 12, 2016 11:13 am

old ... um ... news


wingate
Posts: 655
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 2:06 am

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by wingate » Tue Jan 12, 2016 1:41 pm

For the record Esther Williams was not married to Jeff Chandler.I read the book and she claimed that his cross dressing was a reason for not marrying him.

User avatar
George O'Brien
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:10 pm
Location: An Atoll in the Pacific

Re: "Of Course Reporters Believed It, Because It Was In A Bo

Post by George O'Brien » Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:00 pm

Yes, someone else corrected me that they were not married. But from what you say Esther Williams wrote, that cross dressing was the reason she did not marry Chandler, she actually stacked lie on top of lie. What a louse of a woman!
"This bar of likker is now a bar of justice!"

Post Reply