



It's not necessarily $2 Chuck. They're made by reputable wine labels, but it's relatively confidential...I spent 46 years in the wine business...missdupont wrote: ↑Wed Feb 24, 2021 4:36 pmWhere does TCM and all the other companies that have wine clubs get the grape leftovers to make their wines from, or are they all really just $2 chuck in upscale labels?
Has anyone figured out who the girl is? She looks like an ad that appeared in the 50's to me on a billboard for a 50's screamer, the name of which I forget. The man is definitely Conrad Veidt in "The Man Who Laughs".DavidWelling wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:44 amFYI Melodramatic Macabre was about $13 -- so it wasn't a $2 Chuck but it wasn't Orin Swift either.
She looks like Barbara Steele to me.R Michael Pyle wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 9:00 amHas anyone figured out who the girl is? She looks like an ad that appeared in the 50's to me on a billboard for a 50's screamer, the name of which I forget. The man is definitely Conrad Veidt in "The Man Who Laughs".DavidWelling wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:44 amFYI Melodramatic Macabre was about $13 -- so it wasn't a $2 Chuck but it wasn't Orin Swift either.
Let me answer that - not cattily - but tactfully: begin by realizing that there are very large numbers of wines at $4.99-$7.99 that are genuinely excellent (no, maybe not 100 points on some Parker-like scale), really excellent; and - there are the same number of wines at $400.00 that I wouldn't give you $10 for, or even $4.99-$7.99. That is the God's-honest truth. It's also an industry fact that if a female shopper can't enjoy a wine label on a shelf at 40 feet distance, she probably won't buy it. Marketing is Deity in the wine business today. First of all, there's far, far too much wine in the world for the number of customers available to buy it; lakes of wine. Bargains can be had everywhere. It depends exclusively on how well it's marketed and by whom. The larger the wholesale base, the better most wines sell. If you're a little guy wholesale wise in the US, you can move the smaller brands better, and you'll have a higher margin, but your net isn't even close, and in some years could actually shut you down.missdupont wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:43 pmIt's not necessarily $2 Chuck. They're made by reputable wine labels, but it's relatively confidential...I spent 46 years in the wine business...
So basically the wine clubs are making expensive private label versions of what the grocery stores do in reverse. Whereas grocery stores take someone's leftovers and make the cheaper store label private versions of products, the wine clubs are doing in reverse, with the branding leading to the increased price.
You may very well be right, and it makes sense. Barbara Steele is an icon in the horror genre, and I think she's great in Black Sunday. The opening sequence still gives me shivers.35MM wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 10:00 amShe looks like Barbara Steele to me.R Michael Pyle wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 9:00 amHas anyone figured out who the girl is? She looks like an ad that appeared in the 50's to me on a billboard for a 50's screamer, the name of which I forget. The man is definitely Conrad Veidt in "The Man Who Laughs".DavidWelling wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:44 amFYI Melodramatic Macabre was about $13 -- so it wasn't a $2 Chuck but it wasn't Orin Swift either.
![]()
'Far too much wine' could be a bit of an exaggeration. Some folk will buy in regularly, others of us have to budget, even when we're talking £4.00-£7.00 ($5.55-$9.72) a throw, which is about my range...R Michael Pyle wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 1:13 pmLet me answer that - not cattily - but tactfully: begin by realizing that there are very large numbers of wines at $4.99-$7.99 that are genuinely excellent (no, maybe not 100 points on some Parker-like scale), really excellent; and - there are the same number of wines at $400.00 that I wouldn't give you $10 for, or even $4.99-$7.99. That is the God's-honest truth. It's also an industry fact that if a female shopper can't enjoy a wine label on a shelf at 40 feet distance, she probably won't buy it. Marketing is Deity in the wine business today. First of all, there's far, far too much wine in the world for the number of customers available to buy it; lakes of wine. Bargains can be had everywhere. It depends exclusively on how well it's marketed and by whom. The larger the wholesale base, the better most wines sell. If you're a little guy wholesale wise in the US, you can move the smaller brands better, and you'll have a higher margin, but your net isn't even close, and in some years could actually shut you down.missdupont wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:43 pmIt's not necessarily $2 Chuck. They're made by reputable wine labels, but it's relatively confidential...I spent 46 years in the wine business...
So basically the wine clubs are making expensive private label versions of what the grocery stores do in reverse. Whereas grocery stores take someone's leftovers and make the cheaper store label private versions of products, the wine clubs are doing in reverse, with the branding leading to the increased price.
There. It's no different from most commodities; it's just that we've glamorized the product over the centuries to the point that there's a culture around wine that is so false it's embarrassing. But I loved it when I was in the business and I still do. I've been retired now going on seven years, and I'm also glad of that...but, here's to you, Mary! A good glass of Epicuro aglianico from Puglia - $4.99 at Trader Joe's! It's fabulous!
No, I'm quite serious. For example, nearly twenty years ago now the "lakes of wine" (overproduction without any place to put it) became such an issue in Australia that a famous producer went before their parliament to complain that that margins on higher priced wine had dropped almost 50% because of the necessity to have massive sales to get rid of the wine due to backing up of newer vintages for release. What had happened was that the lower priced wines had literally flooded the market(s) all over the world and had de-focused the emphasis on the top quality good stuffs. What was also true at one time (just about 20 years ago) in Australia was the fact that a new winery was opening there every 24 hours!!!! The parliamentary incident was a world-wide phenomenon leading to a lot of news in the wine world. Most customers, of course, were delighted, not realizing the business consequences to the better producers - and, frankly, to the lesser producers. Since then a couple of things have happened. First, there are far MORE producers today ALL OVER THE WORLD who are in the game, and there has been a MASSIVE increase in interest in what are known as "craft" beers and liquors and liqueurs. The trend back to the hard stuff has created a huge shift in emphasis from wine to other alcoholic beverages, just when a wine apotheosis was occurring. Fine wines have kept on a slight rising trail over these years, but the lesser stuff has seen a massive change in type available and sales. What used to be called generic wines, Chablis, Burgundy, Rhine, Sauterne, not the wine from the countries or provinces named (for example, the actual area in France is Sauternes, with an "s"), have generally disappeared. Today, it takes proprietary names to sell all the stuff in the middle of the road quality. What HAS generally improved in the business is the overall quality of wine! Very highly improved! But, there are now oceans, not lakes of wine available. AND, with that - lots of sales. But there's also been an increase of prices for a lot of people, especially on foreign marketed wines, not because of anything but - - - huge tariffs. Especially here in the States.earlytalkiebuffRob wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 9:04 am
'Far too much wine' could be a bit of an exaggeration.