Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Open, general discussion of silent films, personalities and history.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bruce Long
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 6:55 am

Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by Bruce Long » Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:30 am

During the silent film era, it was rare for prominent insiders to criticize the beauty of the female stars. One of few to do so, Penrhyn Stanlaws was a well-known portrait painter who had also directed several films for Paramount.

Stanlaws wrote an article appearing in the January 1923 issue of Screenland titled, "What's the Matter with Our Hollywood Women?", comparing some of the top female stars to his artistic ideal of beauty.
http://www.archive.org/stream/Screenlan ... 6/mode/1up
Among the stars criticized in Stanlaws' article were Mary Pickford, Mae Murrary, Alla Nazimova, Pola Negri, Betty Compson, Gloria Swanson, Pauline Frederick, Betty Blythe, Claire Windsor, Ruth Roland, Marion Davies, Bebe Daniels, Lila Lee, Viola Dana, Shirley Mason, Anita Stewart Marie Prevost, Wanda Hawley, Clara Kimball Young, Mary Miles Minter, Agnes Ayres, May Allison, Phyllis Haver, Coleen Moore, May McAvoy, Norma Talmadge, Constance Talmadge, Enid Bennett, Hope Hampton, Lillian and Dorothy Gish.

A subsequent issue of Screenland had this amusing tidbit: "All Hollywood chuckled when the Los Angeles Herald, a Hearst publication, reprinted from the January SCREENLAND the Penrhyn Stanlaws story, What's the Matter with Our Hollywood Women--and left out all mention of Mr. Stanlaws' criticism of Marion Davies, Cosmopolitan star..." :wink:

Stanlaws would never direct another Hollywood film. A 1933 newspaper article reported, "In 1922 Stanlaws lost his job as a Hollywood director because he spoke out on Hollywood's pulchritude." But in the same article Stanlaws was still speaking out, criticizing the beauty of current 1933 stars including Mae West, Greta Garbo, Katherine Hepburn, and Jean Harlow.
http://www.fultonhistory.com/Newspaper% ... 207144.pdf

He continued his portrait painting career, and Stanlaws' movie star portraits appeared on the cover of many movie fan magazines, particularly New Movie Magazine.

User avatar
Frederica
Posts: 4862
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by Frederica » Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:58 am

Bruce Long wrote:During the silent film era, it was rare for prominent insiders to criticize the beauty of the female stars. One of few to do so, Penrhyn Stanlaws was a well-known portrait painter who had also directed several films for Paramount.

Stanlaws wrote an article appearing in the January 1923 issue of Screenland titled, "What's the Matter with Our Hollywood Women?", comparing some of the top female stars to his artistic ideal of beauty.
http://www.archive.org/stream/Screenlan ... 6/mode/1up
Among the stars criticized in Stanlaws' article were Mary Pickford, Mae Murrary, Alla Nazimova, Pola Negri, Betty Compson, Gloria Swanson, Pauline Frederick, Betty Blythe, Claire Windsor, Ruth Roland, Marion Davies, Bebe Daniels, Lila Lee, Viola Dana, Shirley Mason, Anita Stewart Marie Prevost, Wanda Hawley, Clara Kimball Young, Mary Miles Minter, Agnes Ayres, May Allison, Phyllis Haver, Coleen Moore, May McAvoy, Norma Talmadge, Constance Talmadge, Enid Bennett, Hope Hampton, Lillian and Dorothy Gish.
Wow. Ew. Mr. Stanlaws was kinda creepy.
Fred
"Who really cares?"
Jordan Peele, when asked what genre we should put his movies in.
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"

User avatar
sc1957
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:49 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by sc1957 » Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:05 am

The Mr. Blackwell of his time. I suppose there always has to be one.
Scott Cameron

User avatar
bobfells
Posts: 3578
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:03 pm
Location: Old Virginny
Contact:

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by bobfells » Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:18 am

Did Stanlaws ever name stars he thought were beautiful? He seems to have dissed every important star of the 20s. My guess is the he was starved for attention and of course as a painter he could be hired to "correct" any facial deficiencies either real or imagined.
Official Biographer of Mr. Arliss

http://www.ArlissArchives.com" target="_blank
http://www.OldHollywoodinColor.com" target="_blank
https://www.Facebook.com/groups/413487728766029/" target="_blank

User avatar
greta de groat
Posts: 2780
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:06 am
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by greta de groat » Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:38 am

How pathetic--an artist with such exacting standards that he can't appreciate beauty.

On some of those, i wonder if he was just making stuff up--he has that elaborate description of Agnes Ayres "faults" but doesn't notice her prominent overbite?

What on earth are "muscle-bound hips"?

greta
Greta de Groat
Unsung Divas of the Silent Screen
http://www.stanford.edu/~gdegroat

User avatar
Frederica
Posts: 4862
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by Frederica » Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:52 am

greta de groat wrote:How pathetic--an artist with such exacting standards that he can't appreciate beauty.

On some of those, i wonder if he was just making stuff up--he has that elaborate description of Agnes Ayres "faults" but doesn't notice her prominent overbite?

What on earth are "muscle-bound hips"?

greta
This article is followed by one entitled "Men Who Are Easy to Love!" Which I note, is not by Penhryn Stanlaws. Is that an oblique commentary on Mr. Stanlaws' obsessive critical focus on female body parts, or is it just an extra layer of creepy? "No analysis of masculine charms would be complete without an ode to Wallie Reid's eyebrow." That's got to be a joke!

Right? Right?? Please tell me that's a joke.
Fred
"Who really cares?"
Jordan Peele, when asked what genre we should put his movies in.
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"

User avatar
Bruce Long
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 6:55 am

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by Bruce Long » Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:33 pm

bobfells wrote:Did Stanlaws ever name stars he thought were beautiful? He seems to have dissed every important star of the 20s....
According to the end of the article, the Feb. 1923 issue of Screenland would have a follow-up Stanlaws article in which: "...I will discuss some of the points of perfection possessed by famous women of the film world. I will select a group which has the greatest number of perfect forms and faces and from them analyze their screen appeal by the difficult standard of true physical symmetry."

I haven't seen that issue, but some other web pages indicate Stanlaws said the most perfect type on the screen was Madge Bellamy.
Last edited by Bruce Long on Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Frederica
Posts: 4862
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by Frederica » Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:32 pm

Bruce Long wrote:
bobfells wrote:Did Stanlaws ever name stars he thought were beautiful? He seems to have dissed every important star of the 20s....
According to the end of the article, the Feb. 1923 issue of Screenland would have a follow-up Stanlaws article in which: "...I will discuss some of the points of perfection possessed by famous women of the film world. I will select a group which has the greatest number of perfect forms and faces and from them analyze their screen appeal by the difficult standard of true physical symmetry." But I haven't seen that issue.
Hrrrmmpphh. I think the famous women of the film world should have been allowed equal time to dissect Mr. Stanlaws' "points of perfection" and analyze his appeal "by the difficult standard of true physical symmetry." Then they can relax and compose an ode to Wallace Reid's eyebrow.

What a silly man.
Fred
"Who really cares?"
Jordan Peele, when asked what genre we should put his movies in.
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"

User avatar
Brooksie
Posts: 3984
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:41 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon via Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by Brooksie » Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:24 pm

greta de groat wrote:What on earth are "muscle-bound hips"?
Apparently he also thought Kay Francis was OK, but was offended by her `overdeveloped triceps'. How she walked out of the house like that every day, I don't know.

User avatar
Frederica
Posts: 4862
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by Frederica » Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:47 pm

Brooksie wrote:
greta de groat wrote:What on earth are "muscle-bound hips"?
Apparently he also thought Kay Francis was OK, but was offended by her `overdeveloped triceps'. How she walked out of the house like that every day, I don't know.
I don't know why all those women even bothered to breathe.
Fred
"Who really cares?"
Jordan Peele, when asked what genre we should put his movies in.
http://www.nitanaldi.com"
http://www.facebook.com/NitaNaldiSilentVamp"

User avatar
N_Phay
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 8:41 am

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by N_Phay » Fri Jul 22, 2011 3:57 pm

"Colleen Moore is exceptional in that she really has no beauty" hahaha WHAT???

User avatar
Christopher Jacobs
Moderator
Posts: 2287
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:53 pm
Location: Grand Forks, North Dakota
Contact:

Re: Stanlaws Burns his Bridges

Post by Christopher Jacobs » Fri Jul 22, 2011 4:14 pm

N_Phay wrote:"Colleen Moore is exceptional in that she really has no beauty" hahaha WHAT???
Maybe he thought she was merely "cute," which isn't quite the same. But some people certainly do have peculiar personal standards of pulchritude and aren't afraid to proclaim them as if everyone else should agree! It would be interesting to see his reactions to today's stars.

Post Reply